Last year, when I decided to get my 11-year-old son a fitness tracker, it didn’t involve a lot of careful deliberation. The truth is, Outside (my former place of employment) was hosting its annual outdoor-gear giveaway for staffers, and, in a rare moment of selflessness, I decided I’d nab something for him instead of stuffing yet another men’s large ski jacket into my swag bag. I chose a Coros Apex, a full-featured wearable that I figured he could happily nerd out on in his idle time. Two weeks later, the watch was only logging neglect, stashed on his desk right next to a dead bonsai tree and a weekly planner that didn’t appear to have been used in months.
Looking back now, perhaps I was fortunate. You can spend anywhere from $50 to $500 on one of these nifty little devices for your kids this holiday season, and it’s highly likely they’ll grow bored of it just as quickly as my son did. That’s a costly mistake, Santa. What’s more, what if your kid actually loves the thing? As I discovered recently, while researching this story, choosing to place a smartwatch on a child’s wrist is a more fraught decision than I imagined. There’s no question that these gadgets can be great for encouraging children to stay active. There are also some surprising downsides, ones much worse than simply finding your marquee holiday purchase among the pile of forgotten gifts on a dusty corner of their desk.
Fitness trackers, everything from simple step counters to the latest version of the Apple Watch, are big business—a $30 billion market in 2019, according to a report from Fortune Business Insights. The category is expected to be worth more than $90 billion by 2027. It was a growth industry before COVID hit, but the global pandemic has only pushed worldwide demand for the devices higher. Since you’re an Outside reader, I’m guessing there’s a good chance that you’re one of nearly 57 million Americans who used a wearable device last year.
Affluent adults (defined as those earning over $75,000 a year, about 31 percent of U.S. adults) and people between the ages of 24 and 35 still make up the largest groups of users. However, companies are increasing their push to target younger users. Garmin is one of the OGs in this field, having introduced the Vivofit Jr. in 2016. Fitbit rolled out the Ace 2 last year, an updated version of the stripped-down wristband that debuted in 2018 that it markets for ages six and up. And while Apple doesn’t position its smartwatch for kids, I know I can’t be the only parent out there who has had to laugh off their child’s request for the new $300 Series 6.
When you see the sales pitches for the youth-targeted devices, it’s easy to think they’re being put out there for the greater social good. The global childhood-obesity epidemic gets top billing in Fitbit’s press release for the Ace 2. A video advertisement for the Vivofit Jr. delivers a similar message—while looking and sounding exactly like the upbeat, inspirational commercials we’re used to seeing for everything from rowing machines to yoga pants.
The selling point isn’t entirely off base: the monitoring devices get children moving, whether they’re being motivated by the games and rewards on the tracker or by a parent behind the scenes using the information to push them to be more active. That said, more critical assessments of the devices argue that they can take the fun out of play, or that they can be a contributing factor to eating disorders or body-image issues. A 2018 study of people in their teens and twenties in the International Journal of Eating Disorders revealed that those who used trackers as a way “to manage weight and shape reported higher levels of eating and compulsive exercise psychopathology than those who reported using tools to improve health and fitness.”
Kids, especially younger ones, are predisposed to be active. The notion of strapping a device to their wrist and forcing them to move feels dystopian, as if we’ve abandoned the idea that play is foremost about having fun. Do we really want to turn children into fitness robots mindlessly accruing more and more steps? Then again, in an era when only 24 percent of American kids log the recommended one hour of exercise a day, perhaps some tech intervention is warranted.
To help me sort through the debate, I reached out to Dr. Blaise Nemeth, an associate professor and provider at the University of Wisconsin Pediatric Fitness Clinic. The first thing he points out is that fitness trackers are still a relatively new phenomenon, and the research into their effects on children is limited.
Nemeth uses trackers with young people in his pediatric fitness programs, but his focus is on helping kids make a connection between how much they’re moving and how they feel. Research shows that people feel better and study or work more effectively when they are more active. So at the clinic where he practices, Nemeth uses the devices merely as a feedback tool to teach kids how to recognize the ways they perform differently in school, sports, or work on days when they’re more active.
Trackers, Nemeth said, can also be useful for busy teenagers. With homework and an ever expanding list of extracurricular commitments, teens often bump exercise down their priority lists. If they’re stressed or having a tough time focusing, a quick-glance prompt from their smartwatch can serve as a reminder to get up and get moving for a bit, even if it’s just taking the dog on a walk around the neighborhood.
However, there are some things parents should consider before buying one. “If it’s being forced on them, it can create conflict between parents and kids and undermine the objective to have fun moving their bodies,” says Nemeth. “Kids tend to use them more when they’re the ones who want them, when they’re the ones in charge of the information. They tend to use them less, and they’re less happy with them, when the parents are in charge of it and parents are in charge of the information.”
To avoid the potential pitfalls that come with fitness trackers, you have to honestly assess your motivations for buying one—and those of the person you’re buying it for. Is your kid an anxious type, one who might end up obsessing over the data at the expense of having actual fun? (If they end up pacing the hallways at night to reach their step count before bedtime, no one’s really benefiting.) If your child is struggling with body-image issues, know that one of these devices could exacerbate that. And while it may be difficult to admit, if you’re the kind of parent that tends to hover, own up to it and skip the tracker.
That said, if you’re just looking for a fun way to help your kids be more active—or make their holiday dreams come true—a fitness tracker can still be a good option. Just don’t forget your role in all this. Taking the time to share the joy of hiking, running, skiing, basketball—whatever outdoor activity you love—with your kids will be way more effective in the long run than a swanky $400 watch.
Support Outside Online
Our mission to inspire readers to get outside has never been more critical. In recent years, Outside Online has reported on groundbreaking research linking time in nature to improved mental and physical health, and we’ve kept you informed about the unprecedented threats to America’s public lands. Our rigorous coverage helps spark important debates about wellness and travel and adventure, and it provides readers an accessible gateway to new outdoor passions. Time outside is essential—and we can help you make the most of it. Making a financial contribution to Outside Online only takes a few minutes and will ensure we can continue supplying the trailblazing, informative journalism that readers like you depend on. We hope you’ll support us. Thank you.
Lead Photo: Gabriel (Gabi) Bucataru/Stocksy